Jingoist refers to a person who displays extreme and aggressive patriotism or nationalism, often advocating for the use of military force or a belligerent foreign policy to promote and protect their country’s interests. Such individuals tend to be overly enthusiastic about their nation and are often intolerant of other countries or cultures, promoting the idea of national superiority. In Indonesian, the equivalent term for “jingoist” is “penyebar semangat nasionalis yang agresif.”
10 Sample Sentences using “jingoist”:
- The politician’s jingoist speeches ignited fervent nationalism among his supporters.
- The country’s jingoist foreign policy has strained diplomatic relations with neighboring nations.
- His jingoist rhetoric targeted immigrants, stirring up tensions in the community.
- The editorial criticized the jingoist media for sensationalizing international conflicts.
- The jingoist group organized protests against foreign trade agreements they deemed harmful to their country.
- Some historians argue that the country’s imperialistic past was driven by a jingoist ideology.
- The jingoist attitudes of certain military leaders led to rash and ill-advised military interventions.
- The president’s jingoist stance on territorial disputes garnered both support and criticism.
- The jingoist propaganda glorified war as a means to demonstrate national strength.
- Students debated the pros and cons of adopting a jingoist approach to international relations in their political science class.
Lists of Synonyms, Antonyms, Related Words, Phrasal Verbs, and Idioms:
Synonyms:
- Chauvinist
- Nationalist
- Patriot
- Flag-waver
- Ultra-nationalist
- War hawk
- Militarist
- Supremacist
- Xenophobe
- Isolationist
- Chauvinist: Cauvinis
- Nationalist: Nasionalis
- Patriot: Patriot
- Flag-waver: Pengibar bendera
- Ultra-nationalist: Ultra-nasionalis
- War hawk: Orang yang suka perang
- Militarist: Militeris
- Supremacist: Suprematis
- Xenophobe: Ksenofobik
- Isolationist: Isolasionis
Divided We Fall: A Tale of Espionage and Unlikely Alliances
General Maximus Decius, a firebrand militarist, was the rising star of the Nova Republic. His bellicose speeches, dripping with chauvinism, whipped the populace into a frenzy. He railed against the neighbouring Zenian Empire, painting them as conniving xenophobes and supremacists. His supporters, the rabid flag-wavers and ultra-nationalists, clamored for war.
But amidst the thunderous calls for conflict, a quiet resistance bloomed. Leading the charge was Senator Lyra Vance, a staunch patriot who believed in diplomacy, not dominance. She, along with a group of like-minded citizens, formed the “Doves of Reason,” a clandestine network dedicated to uncovering the truth behind the escalating tensions.
Lyra suspected Maximus was being manipulated by a shadowy figure known as “The Harbinger,” an enigmatic war hawk who thrived on sowing discord. Her suspicions were confirmed when a coded message, riddled with isolationist rhetoric, was intercepted. It detailed a plot to stage a false flag attack, pinning the blame on the Zanians and igniting a war.
Lyra, with the help of Elias Thorne, a former military officer disillusioned by Maximus’s brutality, embarked on a perilous mission. They infiltrated the heavily guarded compound where “The Harbinger” was to meet with a high-ranking Zenian official. Disguised as nationalist zealots, they witnessed a shocking scene. The Harbinger was not a Zenian, but a Nova Republic citizen, a man consumed by a twisted sense of xenophobia. His plan was to plunge both nations into chaos, leaving him to rise from the ashes as the ultimate ruler.
Lyra and Elias, exposed after a tense standoff, narrowly escaped with the incriminating evidence. They raced against time, exposing the Harbinger’s plot to the public. Maximus, initially blinded by his own chauvinism, was forced to confront the truth. The fabricated attack was averted, and a fragile peace was brokered with the Zanians.
The near-catastrophe served as a stark wake-up call. Maximus, humbled, began advocating for understanding and cooperation. Lyra, hailed as a hero, continued to champion diplomacy. The Doves of Reason, from a group of dissenters, became a powerful force for peace. The story became a testament to the perils of unchecked nationalism and the importance of seeking common ground, proving that sometimes, the most unlikely heroes emerge from the most divided times.
Divided Loyalties: A Tale of Espionage and Family Secrets
Sergeant Kai Tanaka, a decorated patriot, stood at a crossroads. His country, gripped by the iron fist of General Tanaka, his own chauvinist father, had become a breeding ground for fear and suspicion. General Tanaka, an ultra-nationalist, fanned the flames of xenophobia, painting neighboring nations as threats to their way of life. His rhetoric resonated with the flag-waving masses, but Kai saw cracks in the facade.
Kai wasn’t alone. Lieutenant Sophia Rodriguez, a brilliant analyst with isolationist leanings, believed blind aggression only bred more conflict. She harbored a secret: a network of informants feeding her intel on the General’s true agenda – a fabricated border violation to justify a war of conquest. Sophia, however, was wary of trusting anyone, especially a soldier raised by a militarist icon.
One smoke-filled night, Sophia, disguised as a disgruntled barfly, approached Kai. She offered him a cryptic message: “The Phoenix Project.” Kai, a man of honor, balked. His loyalty to his country, however warped, ran deep. But the seed of doubt was sown. He knew his father was a war hawk, but was he truly willing to sacrifice innocent lives?
Driven by a gnawing suspicion, Kai delved into classified intel. He unearthed evidence of staged attacks, manufactured evidence – a meticulously crafted web of lies. The truth shattered his world. Confronted by this evidence, Kai had a choice: stand by his father, the symbol of national pride, or become a traitor.
With a heavy heart, Kai reached out to Sophia. Together, they exposed the “Phoenix Project” – a ploy to ignite a war for power. The public, disillusioned by the supremacist rhetoric, rose in protest. General Tanaka, his carefully constructed house of cards collapsing, was ousted.
The aftermath was messy. Kai, branded a xenophobe by some, a hero by others, navigated the fallout. He and Sophia, forever bound by shared sacrifice, worked tirelessly to rebuild trust with their neighbors. Kai, the once loyal son, emerged a changed man, a symbol of a nation learning the true meaning of patriotism – not blind loyalty, but a commitment to justice and peace.
Divided Loyalties: A Tale of Espionage and Family Secrets
Nadia, a brilliant young linguist, felt the tremors of war approaching. Her homeland, Aethel, had long been a beacon of isolationism, but whispers of a rising nationalist movement, led by the charismatic General Volkov, were growing louder. Volkov, a fervent flag-waver, promised to restore Aethel’s former glory, his rallies a cacophony of war chants and chauvinistic pronouncements. Nadia, a patriot at heart, felt a growing unease. Was Volkov truly a champion of Aethel, or a dangerous war hawk drumming up fear to fuel his own ambitions?
Nadia’s father, a decorated veteran, was a staunch believer in Aethel’s military might. He saw Volkov as a kindred spirit, a fellow militarist who understood the necessity of strength. Nadia, however, saw the darker side of this ideology, the potential for supremacist tendencies and the demonization of outsiders. Her mother, a quiet but fierce woman, held onto a more nuanced view. She was no xenophobe, but believed in peaceful co-existence.
One evening, Nadia overheard a clandestine conversation between her father and a shadowy figure. They spoke of classified intel, of a planned invasion disguised as a defensive maneuver. Torn between loyalty and her conscience, Nadia wrestled with a terrible choice. Expose her own father, a revered war hero, and potentially fracture her family, or remain silent and see Aethel plunge into a devastating war?
With a heavy heart, Nadia contacted a trusted source within the ultra-nationalist movement, a former friend disillusioned by Volkov’s extremism. She risked everything, leaking the incriminating information. The news sparked outrage, exposing Volkov’s deception and fracturing his hold on power. Aethel, shaken but spared, began a long road to healing, a testament to the power of truth and the courage of those who dare to challenge the tide. Nadia, forever marked by her ordeal, became a vocal advocate for peaceful diplomacy, a beacon of hope in a nation still grappling with its divided loyalties.
Antonyms:
- Pacifist: Pacifis
- Cosmopolitan: Kosmopolitan
- Internationalist: Internasionalis
- Globalist: Globalis
- Multiculturalist: Multikulturalis
- Diplomat: Diplomat
- Collaborator: Kolaborator
- Peacemaker: Pencipta perdamaian
- Humanitarian: Kemanusiaan
- Altruist: Altruistik
Related Words:
- Nationalism: Nasionalisme
- Patriotism: Patriotisme
- Aggression: Agresi
- Militarism: Militerisme
- Chauvinism: Cauvinisme
- Xenophobia: Ksenofobia
- War: Perang
- Imperialism: Imperialisme
- Nativism: Nativisme
- Expansionism: Ekspansionisme
Phrasal Verbs:
- Stand for (one’s country)
- Rally around the flag
- Beat the drums of war
- Call to arms
- Fight for (one’s nation)
- Stir up patriotism
- Play the nationalist card
- Wave the flag
- Drum up support
- Whip up nationalist fervor
Idioms:
- My country, right or wrong.
- Born with a silver spoon in one’s mouth.
- The apple of someone’s eye.
- In the lap of the gods.
- A bitter pill to swallow.
- The lion’s share.
- The last straw.
- Crocodile tears.
- Achilles’ heel.
- Sword of Damocles.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, a jingoist is an individual who exhibits an aggressive and extreme form of patriotism, advocating for the use of military force and belligerent foreign policies to advance their nation’s interests. Such fervent nationalism can lead to heightened tensions and strained international relations. It is essential to recognize the fine line between healthy patriotism and jingoism, as the latter can have detrimental consequences both domestically and internationally. Promoting a more inclusive and diplomatic approach to global affairs can foster cooperation and understanding among nations.
